good. thx.
Le 2018-05-25 à 4:56, Greg Mirsky a écrit :
Hi Martin,
apologies for the delay. Yes, this text left after active-tails document
was spawned. Would the following be acceptable:
Poll (P)
Set to 1 if the local system is sending a Poll Sequence, or 0
if not.
Regards,
Greg
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Martin Vigoureux
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Greg,
looking back in the doc I found:
Poll (P)
Set to 1 if the local system is sending a Poll Sequence or
is a
session of type MultipointHead soliciting the identities
of the
tails, or 0 if not.
This looks to me as not being in line with the rest of the document,
especially the part on "MultipointHead soliciting the identities of
the tails".
Am I right in thinking that this anticipates on
draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail ?
If so, please clarify this in the doc; if not, please correct me.
Thanks
-m
Le 2018-05-15 à 1:09, Greg Mirsky a écrit :
Hi Michael,
thank you for the most expedient response. Both updates are in
the new working version.
Regards,
Greg
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Michael Richardson
<[email protected] <mailto:mcr%[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:mcr%[email protected]>>>
wrote:
Greg Mirsky <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
wrote:
> The text that follows the first sentence in section
4.13.1 is the
> replacement of the entire section 6.8.6 of RFC 5880.
Would
stressing that
> make the relationship more clear, e.g.:
txt> The following procedure replaces the entire
section 6.8.6
of [RFC5880].
> And the same can be applied to the first sentence in
section
14.3.3:
txt> The following procedure replaces the entire
section 6.8.7
of [RFC5880].
That seems like good text.
-- ] Never tell me the odds!
| ipv6 mesh
networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works |
network
architect [
] [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
