SORRY,

Point 1 Below should read as 
" 1) Imposition of Penalty for not appearing at SIC hearing is
 NOWHERE sanctioned by RTI Act."

Sarbajit

--- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Manoj
> 
> 1) Imposition of Penalty for not appearing at SIC hearing is
> sanctioned by RTI Act.
> 
> 2)Imposition of Penalty for not giving any reply for more than 6
> months will not stand either when the Appellant himself failed to turn
> up for his hearing. In any case when no reply is received from PIO -
> the proper course of action is to file a Complaint u/s 18 for "deemed
> refusal".
> 
> Sarbajit
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Manoj K. Kamra" <kamramk8@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sh.Bhushan Kumar,
> > 
> > In my opinion,you should at least file RTI application to PIO/SIC 
> > seeking for relevant ruling of RTI act for not imposing any penality 
> > despite respondent not appearing in the hearing despite not giving 
> > any reply for more than six months.
> > 
> > On the basis of false reply of commission in first & second appeal 
> > in this matter,writ petition should be filed in the highcourt.
> > 
> > Expert opinion of Sarbajit Royji and other members should be awaited.
> > 
> > regards
> > Manoj K.Kamra
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Bhushan Kumar <b4bhushan@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Do we need commissions for such a decisions????
> > > 
> > > 
> > *********************************************************************
> > ****************
> > > 
> > > STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
> > > SCO No. 32-34, 1st Floor,  Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
> > > 
> > > Sh. Bhushan Kumar,
> > > XYZ,
> > > ABC
> > > ,
> > > .                                                                 
> > _________________ Appellant
> > >       
> > > Vs.
> > > Public Information Officer, 
> > > O/o Principal Secretary to Govt. , Punjab , 
> > > Deptt. Of Home & Justice,
> > > Mini Sectt. Sector 9,
> > > 
> > Chandigarh.                                                          
> >      ________________ Respondent
> > >  
> > > AC No. 376 of 2007
> > > Present:          None   
> > >  
> > >  
> > > ORDER
> > >  
> > >             Neither the appellant nor the respondent are present. 
> > The case is disposed of with the direction to the respondent to give 
> > a suitable response to the appellant under the RTI Act, with 
> > reference to his application for information dated 3-7-2007, within 
> > 15 days of the date of receipt of these orders, if not already done.
> > >  
> > >  
> > >                                                                    
> >                              (P.K.Verma)
> > >                                                                    
> >                  State Information Commissioner    
> > > 10th January, 2008
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to 
> > know how.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >       Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all 
> > under one roof. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to