> Debadutta should go in for a 2nd Appeal > and a Complain with the CIC > immediately, else his matter would be time barred, as
Are you suggesting that he should go for both the 2nd Appeal as well as Complaint? Is that allowed? We all know the attitude of CIC towards Complaints? Sidharth --- In [email protected], Manoj Pai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since the API / CPIO has to transfer an application to > another Public Authority within 5 days (u/s 6.3) the > part of the CPIO asking for proof of citizenship is > malafide. There was no need to file a First Appeal in > this case, Debadutta could have gone in for a complain > to the CIC u/s 18. > > The FAA has to dispose of the appeal withing 30 days. > He is also allowed an additional 15 days, provided its > recorded and communicated in writing. Since over three > months (say 90 days) have passed, Debadutta should go > in for a 2nd Appeal and a Complain with the CIC > immediately, else his matter would be time barred, as > was done by OPK in one of his recent decisions. > > Best wishes > > Manoj Pai > Ahmedabad > --- Sidharth Misra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello Nidhi, Sarbajit and group, > > > > My friend Debadutta was asked to submit proof of > > citizenship > > sometimes back. The proof of citizenship was asked > > on the 28th day of > > filing the RTI Application. > > > > First Appeallate is avoiding hearing for last 3 > > months. > > > > PA : BSNL, Bhubaneswar, Orissa > > > > Plz revert to me if you need further info. > > > > Sidharth >
