in my case ansari insead of providing me information and hearing my complaint 
within his jurisdiction of RTI act, advise me to take another legal remedy. i 
also interested to party to writ aganst ansari and other cic's
tarun parmar
i can forward my file 

--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of sheds/plots by 
Development Authorities an exempt information?
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 12:16 PM






We want to act within our means.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com] On Behalf
Of Satish Kumar Kapoor
Sent: 13 November 2008 10:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com
Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of sheds/plots by
Development Authorities an exempt information?

Dear Mr Rakesh Agarwal
 
why only IC Ms Padma & Mr Ansari? what about other ICs like Mr Tiwari
 
S.k.kapoor

--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED] org> wrote:

From: Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED] org>
Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of sheds/plots by
Development Authorities an exempt information?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com
Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 10:25 AM

Mr Singhal, please let me have a copy of the entire file. We are planning a
writ against Padma and Ansari.

Regards / Rakesh Agarwal / NyayaBhoomi

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com [mailto:rti_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com] On
Behalf Of M K Singhal
Sent: 13 November 2008 09:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com
Subject: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of sheds/plots by Development
Authorities an exempt information?

This is just to share my experience of a hearing attended by me in the
office of Ms Padma Balaubramaniam, Information Commissioner, New Delhi on
Nov 12, 08. I had requested CPIO, Delhi State Industrial Devlopment
Corporation (DSIDC), Patparganj, Delhi, vide my application dated 07.01.08,
to supply me a list of allottees of the multistoreyed flatted factory
complex built by them under relocation scheme in Jhilmil, East Delhi. The
list was to include names, addresses and telephone nos of allottees. The
CPIO however refused to supply the list with the addresses of allottees
since, according to him, addresses could not be supplied under exemption
clause no 8(1)(j) and clause 11 of h act. I thereafter preferred 1st appeal
stating that the addresses were part of the identity of the allottees and
could not be denied under the said exmption clauses. The 1st Appelat
Authority however ruled that the addresses could not be disclosed under the
exemption clause
as the addresses were directly related to the privacy of the units, they had
no relationship with any public interest and they could be misused to cause
unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the allottees. Not satisfied, I filed
2nd appeal with CIC, Delhi and my 2nd appeal was heard by Ms Padma
Balasubramanium, Information Commissioner in her office on 12.11.08. Instead
of considering my plea that addresses were an intrinsic part of the identity
of allottees, she enquired why did I require the list of allottees with
addresses and what public interest it would serve. I told her that I was not
a public leader and was not concerned if they would be of any public
interest. I needed this list for my personal information. She then asked me
why was I interested in this information. I told her that as per RTIA, I was
not required to give reasons while asking for this information. In fact,
this information should already have been given on DSIDC website for
everybody¢s information. She then asked me if I could similiarly ask for her
residential address too. I told her that since she was a govt employee, I
could certainly ask for it too. She said she was not convinced. She agreed
with CPIO, DSIDC that the list should not contain the addresses of the
allottees in view of the exemption clauses. 
I would like to know the comments of the members if such an interpretation
by IC, Delhi in regard to addresses of allottees is correct and if there
were any such precedants of this nature in the past. 
It would be interesting to recollect that voter lists, telephone directory
etc give names as well as addresses and the present stress of Govts to
publish land records would be meaningless if the names with addresses of the
land owners are not given. All Development Authorities eg GDA, DDA, Noida
etc hould be required to give the names and addresses of their allottees on
their websites as part of Sec 4 suo moto declaration.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in <mailto:mk.singhal% 40yahoo.co. in> 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.
yahoo.com/ invite/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to