My Dear Rakesh, I was happy to know that you are planning some legal action against irresponsible ICs such as Ansari and Balasubramaniam. I will certainly send the full file to you as soon as I get orders in writing from Ms Balasubramanium. At the moment I had only stated whatever had happened with me during the hearing of this case on 12.11.08 before Ms Balasubramanium. I do not know how long will it take for me to recieve the orders in writing. I will check up on phone from ICs office oday. Thanks and best wishes, sincerely,
________________________________ From: Nikhil Notty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, 13 November, 2008 9:42:23 PM Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Is addresses of allottees of sheds/plots by Development Authorities an exemp Good , You guys are really determined to change india with the power of RTI . All the best , and god bless u friends . I strongly believe there should be ppl who use RTI to make the bureaucrats capable to feel patriotic . India need real patriotic with the sense of justice to humanity .... remove the selfishness , and think of Humanity , and thats what u guys are doing . and GOD will definitely bless u . Regards , Nikhil --- On Thu, 11/13/08, sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: > From: sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> > Subject: [rti_india] Re: Is addresses of allottees of sheds/plots by > Development Authorities an exemp > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 8:45 PM > Hi Tarun > > Welcome to RTI India. > > Could you please share more details of > your case with us on the group. Mr Ansari > handles RTI cases in a way different from > the other ICs - so I would like to know > what happened, and what you asked for. > > BTW, you cannot file a WP against an individual > IC but you proceed against the CIC itself. > > Sarbajit > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com, tarun parmar > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > in my case ansari insead of providing me information > and hearing my > complaint within his jurisdiction of RTI act, advise me to > take > another legal remedy. i also interested to party to writ > aganst ansari > and other cic's > > tarun parmar > > i can forward my file > > > > --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Rakesh Agarwal > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From: Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of > sheds/plots by > Development Authorities an exempt information? > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com > > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 12:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We want to act within our means. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com > [mailto:rti_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com] > On Behalf > > Of Satish Kumar Kapoor > > Sent: 13 November 2008 10:35 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com > > Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of > sheds/plots by > > Development Authorities an exempt information? > > > > Dear Mr Rakesh Agarwal > > > > why only IC Ms Padma & Mr Ansari? what about other > ICs like Mr Tiwari > > > > S.k.kapoor > > > > --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Rakesh Agarwal > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] . org> wrote: > > > > From: Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED] . org> > > Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of > sheds/plots by > > Development Authorities an exempt information? > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com > > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 10:25 AM > > > > Mr Singhal, please let me have a copy of the entire > file. We are > planning a > > writ against Padma and Ansari. > > > > Regards / Rakesh Agarwal / NyayaBhoomi > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com [mailto:rti_ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com] On > > Behalf Of M K Singhal > > Sent: 13 November 2008 09:59 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com > > Subject: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of > sheds/plots by > Development > > Authorities an exempt information? > > > > This is just to share my experience of a hearing > attended by me in the > > office of Ms Padma Balaubramaniam, Information > Commissioner, New > Delhi on > > Nov 12, 08. I had requested CPIO, Delhi State > Industrial Devlopment > > Corporation (DSIDC), Patparganj, Delhi, vide my > application dated > 07.01.08, > > to supply me a list of allottees of the multistoreyed > flatted factory > > complex built by them under relocation scheme in > Jhilmil, East > Delhi. The > > list was to include names, addresses and telephone nos > of allottees. The > > CPIO however refused to supply the list with the > addresses of allottees > > since, according to him, addresses could not be > supplied under exemption > > clause no 8(1)(j) and clause 11 of h act. I thereafter > preferred 1st > appeal > > stating that the addresses were part of the identity > of the > allottees and > > could not be denied under the said exmption clauses. > The 1st Appelat > > Authority however ruled that the addresses could not > be disclosed > under the > > exemption clause > > as the addresses were directly related to the privacy > of the units, > they had > > no relationship with any public interest and they > could be misused > to cause > > unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the allottees. > Not satisfied, > I filed > > 2nd appeal with CIC, Delhi and my 2nd appeal was heard > by Ms Padma > > Balasubramanium, Information Commissioner in her > office on 12.11.08. > Instead > > of considering my plea that addresses were an > intrinsic part of the > identity > > of allottees, she enquired why did I require the list > of allottees with > > addresses and what public interest it would serve. I > told her that I > was not > > a public leader and was not concerned if they would be > of any public > > interest. I needed this list for my personal > information. She then > asked me > > why was I interested in this information. I told her > that as per > RTIA, I was > > not required to give reasons while asking for this > information. In fact, > > this information should already have been given on > DSIDC website for > > everybody¢s information. She then asked me if I could > similiarly ask > for her > > residential address too. I told her that since she was > a govt > employee, I > > could certainly ask for it too. She said she was not > convinced. She > agreed > > with CPIO, DSIDC that the list should not contain the > addresses of the > > allottees in view of the exemption clauses. > > I would like to know the comments of the members if > such an > interpretation > > by IC, Delhi in regard to addresses of allottees is > correct and if there > > were any such precedants of this nature in the past. > > It would be interesting to recollect that voter lists, > telephone > directory > > etc give names as well as addresses and the present > stress of Govts to > > publish land records would be meaningless if the names > with > addresses of the > > land owners are not given. All Development Authorities > eg GDA, DDA, > Noida > > etc hould be required to give the names and addresses > of their > allottees on > > their websites as part of Sec 4 suo moto declaration. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in <mailto:mk.singhal% > 40yahoo.co. in> > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to > http://messenger. > > yahoo.com/ invite/ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
