Good ,
You guys are really determined to change india with the power of RTI .
All the best , and god bless u friends .
I strongly believe there should be ppl who use RTI to make the bureaucrats
capable to feel patriotic .
India need real patriotic with the sense of justice to humanity ....
remove the selfishness , and think of Humanity , and thats what u guys are
doing . and GOD will definitely bless u .
Regards ,
Nikhil
--- On Thu, 11/13/08, sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [rti_india] Re: Is addresses of allottees of sheds/plots by
> Development Authorities an exemp
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 8:45 PM
> Hi Tarun
>
> Welcome to RTI India.
>
> Could you please share more details of
> your case with us on the group. Mr Ansari
> handles RTI cases in a way different from
> the other ICs - so I would like to know
> what happened, and what you asked for.
>
> BTW, you cannot file a WP against an individual
> IC but you proceed against the CIC itself.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- In [email protected], tarun parmar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > in my case ansari insead of providing me information
> and hearing my
> complaint within his jurisdiction of RTI act, advise me to
> take
> another legal remedy. i also interested to party to writ
> aganst ansari
> and other cic's
> > tarun parmar
> > i can forward my file
> >
> > --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Rakesh Agarwal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of
> sheds/plots by
> Development Authorities an exempt information?
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 12:16 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > We want to act within our means.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com]
> On Behalf
> > Of Satish Kumar Kapoor
> > Sent: 13 November 2008 10:35
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com
> > Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of
> sheds/plots by
> > Development Authorities an exempt information?
> >
> > Dear Mr Rakesh Agarwal
> >
> > why only IC Ms Padma & Mr Ansari? what about other
> ICs like Mr Tiwari
> >
> > S.k.kapoor
> >
> > --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Rakesh Agarwal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rakesh Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED] org>
> > Subject: RE: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of
> sheds/plots by
> > Development Authorities an exempt information?
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com
> > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 10:25 AM
> >
> > Mr Singhal, please let me have a copy of the entire
> file. We are
> planning a
> > writ against Padma and Ansari.
> >
> > Regards / Rakesh Agarwal / NyayaBhoomi
> >
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com [mailto:rti_
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com] On
> > Behalf Of M K Singhal
> > Sent: 13 November 2008 09:59
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com
> > Subject: [rti_india] Is addresses of allottees of
> sheds/plots by
> Development
> > Authorities an exempt information?
> >
> > This is just to share my experience of a hearing
> attended by me in the
> > office of Ms Padma Balaubramaniam, Information
> Commissioner, New
> Delhi on
> > Nov 12, 08. I had requested CPIO, Delhi State
> Industrial Devlopment
> > Corporation (DSIDC), Patparganj, Delhi, vide my
> application dated
> 07.01.08,
> > to supply me a list of allottees of the multistoreyed
> flatted factory
> > complex built by them under relocation scheme in
> Jhilmil, East
> Delhi. The
> > list was to include names, addresses and telephone nos
> of allottees. The
> > CPIO however refused to supply the list with the
> addresses of allottees
> > since, according to him, addresses could not be
> supplied under exemption
> > clause no 8(1)(j) and clause 11 of h act. I thereafter
> preferred 1st
> appeal
> > stating that the addresses were part of the identity
> of the
> allottees and
> > could not be denied under the said exmption clauses.
> The 1st Appelat
> > Authority however ruled that the addresses could not
> be disclosed
> under the
> > exemption clause
> > as the addresses were directly related to the privacy
> of the units,
> they had
> > no relationship with any public interest and they
> could be misused
> to cause
> > unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the allottees.
> Not satisfied,
> I filed
> > 2nd appeal with CIC, Delhi and my 2nd appeal was heard
> by Ms Padma
> > Balasubramanium, Information Commissioner in her
> office on 12.11.08.
> Instead
> > of considering my plea that addresses were an
> intrinsic part of the
> identity
> > of allottees, she enquired why did I require the list
> of allottees with
> > addresses and what public interest it would serve. I
> told her that I
> was not
> > a public leader and was not concerned if they would be
> of any public
> > interest. I needed this list for my personal
> information. She then
> asked me
> > why was I interested in this information. I told her
> that as per
> RTIA, I was
> > not required to give reasons while asking for this
> information. In fact,
> > this information should already have been given on
> DSIDC website for
> > everybody¢s information. She then asked me if I could
> similiarly ask
> for her
> > residential address too. I told her that since she was
> a govt
> employee, I
> > could certainly ask for it too. She said she was not
> convinced. She
> agreed
> > with CPIO, DSIDC that the list should not contain the
> addresses of the
> > allottees in view of the exemption clauses.
> > I would like to know the comments of the members if
> such an
> interpretation
> > by IC, Delhi in regard to addresses of allottees is
> correct and if there
> > were any such precedants of this nature in the past.
> > It would be interesting to recollect that voter lists,
> telephone
> directory
> > etc give names as well as addresses and the present
> stress of Govts to
> > publish land records would be meaningless if the names
> with
> addresses of the
> > land owners are not given. All Development Authorities
> eg GDA, DDA,
> Noida
> > etc hould be required to give the names and addresses
> of their
> allottees on
> > their websites as part of Sec 4 suo moto declaration.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in <mailto:mk.singhal%
> 40yahoo.co. in>
> >
> > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to
> http://messenger.
> > yahoo.com/ invite/
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
