> Photography is perfectly justified for "inspection" of non-documents
I am relieved to here this. But "kanjoosi". Not really. It is more to do with practicality. Photography is a costly hobby. > depriving the state from it's "further fees" I think by alowing me to take photographs the state will rather save money. I was not sure about "Spying" part though. I have never thought of that angle. Sidharth ----- Original Message ----- From: sroy1947 To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 12:35 PM Subject: [rti_india] Re: S O S : Taking Photographs during inspections not allowed The problem is that you want to photograph "files" during your inspection. Technically this is called "spying". Furthermore you are to provide you copies of the information. where copies cannot be created, but when there is already a reasonably priced method available to you(A3 xerox at a mere Rs.2 per page), demanding photography is "bad form". In passing (not directed at you personally), I am constantly amazed by the "kanjoosi" of some RTIers. Sarbajit --- In [email protected], Sidharth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
