It all depends what decisions he has delivered in the benifit of the public at large. Bunch
--- On Sat, 27/12/08, Satish Kumar Kapoor <[email protected]> wrote: From: Satish Kumar Kapoor <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Shailesh RTI Man of the Year To: [email protected] Date: Saturday, 27 December, 2008, 10:33 AM Dear all It is quality and not rate of disposals that matter. S.K.Kapoor --- On Fri, 12/26/08, sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@ gmail.com> wrote: From: sarbajit roy <mail.sarbajitroy@ gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Shailesh RTI Man of the Year To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com Date: Friday, December 26, 2008, 2:54 PM Since this thread originates from HumJanenge it is better that it is carried on over there. Sarbajit On 12/26/08, ashish kr1965 <ashishkr1965@ yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Veeresh ; > > If the contention is rate of disposal then ICs Tiwari, Ansari > and now Sharma lead the pack. > > Mr Gandhi is only able to dispose of the easy cases "speedily" > In the difficult situations he gets bogged down and seeks the > assistance of his NCPRI seniors. > > recently "RTI_advice" had forwarded me a mail which Shailesh Gandhi > had circulated for assistance concerning an RTI appeal > involving Ajit Bhattacharjee' s NGO the CMS who had published > information given to them in RTI on their website. Apparently > there are some tricky legal points which Shailesh has been > unable to pass orders on despite 3 hearings in the matter, > and he is now desparately seeking a way out to save > CMS from censure. > > There are many other similar cases when Shailesh has > passed orders favouring NCPRI persons and his Mumbai Mitra > Mandal cronies. > l > Ashish > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Explore your hobbies and interests. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
