Dear Vihar You filed this RTI without reading the RTI Act properly.
Now on 14.01.2009 your matter will come up before Mr.Haleem Khan the Secy/CIC. It is imperative that you attend this hearing personally and ensure that no harm is caused for other persons by the order he shall pass against you in your absence. http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/FAAD_26122008_01.pdf Can you find anywhere in the Act a power to ENFORCE section 4 given to any person? Section 19(8)(a) does not do so explicitly (read it carefully). In my view at best the CIC can make suggestions and recommendations on its own steam. Accordingly there is no Nodal EXTERNAL Agency to monitor sec 4 compliance. The remedy for section 4 non-compliance is in the Writ jurisdiction to an affected person who fails to get the information in a subsequent section 6 RTI request and after the various appeals are infructuous. PS: Please avoid using MS-Word to compose messages to this group as it leaves funny formatting characters in our record. (use Notepad instead) Sarbajit --- In [email protected], Vihar Durve <natureind...@...> wrote: > >  Dear All, > 1) > a) RTI Application was filed to CIC  with an intent to find name of Nodal Agency to monitor Sec 4 Complince. Ignoring power conferred to CIC & SIC 19*) (a) , CIC CPIO informed that's its DoPT's  job( CIC/ CPIO/ 2008/ 1248 dtd. 29th Oct 08) . > 1st Appeal was filed to furnish the documents which states its job of of DoPT. > No reply from CIC CPIO, however 1st Appeal is scheduled on 14.1.09 @ 3. 40 room no 315, 2d floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place New Delhi 110066.(Attending)  > b)DoPT says its CIC' job  ( 12/170/2008-IR dtd. 23.12.08 . ) >  > 2) > a)Same RTI was filed with Mah State In Co. whose PIO informed ( 13/11/2008) information doesn't come under RTI. > b)Mah Gen Admn Dept informed its job of Mah SIC. District Collectors have also been informed about the same.( Kemaaa-2008/ PK/ 551 /08/06 dtd. 18.12.2008 . > regards >  vihar >
