I perfectly agrre with you. Best Regards - Mohammed Afzal.
_____________________________________________________________________ On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM, COL. SHIVRAJ KUMAR <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear All, > I am very happy that a debate got initiated on the good work done by Shri > Shailesh Gandhi as CIC by hiring volunteers for his office at his own > expense. > You all can see that how we interpret each activity of the govt officials. > I was present in the hall at Mumbai, when Shailesh said all this. The media > has not brought out the correct picture, in that, he was forced to do this > because the lack of staff shall increase the pending files and the RTI act > shall become like any other govt department where the cases are decided > after many years. > *RTI act will, then, die its natural death. He is forcing the departments > he > is handling to give the correct information in itme to the applicant so > that > the appeals reduce. This is the aim for a better service to the society.* > *I urge the citizens of India to support all such govt officials, not only > Shailesh, who are prepared to use their personal resources for better > efficiency.* > *In my opinion, Shailesh, a young enthusiast, has not violated any law. The > govt is outsourcing so many activities in almost all departments and this > is > one such activity.* > ** > regards > Col Shivraj > regards > Col Shivraj > > On 3/9/09, sroy1947 <[email protected] <sroy1947%40yahoo.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi Sid > > > > Mr H's disapproval is oblique. > > > > 1) IC (SG) has breached OSA by allowing his private interns to have > access > > to CIC documents WITHOUT the approval of CIC. > > > > 2) On of his interns (a lady lawyer) was extremely rude to me (and > > incidentally attempted to teach me RTI Act) when I had some cause to > visit > > IC(SG)'s office to enquire about his cause list for the day and 3rd party > > participation in hearings. IC(SG) backed up this lady, refuses to take > note > > of the procedural Rules and and refuses to allow 3rd parties to have > their > > say before him - quite unlike the approach of other ICs like C'IC, IC(AT) > > and IC(MLS) etc. where we have repeatedly demonstrated the necessity of > 3rd > > party intervention to prevent miscarriages of law > > > > 3) The fact that IC(SG) does not allow 3rd parties to speak (in violation > > of duly notified Rules) is clear evidence that he is a scofflaw, corrupt > > and/or insecure individual. > > > > 4) BTW: Who really pays for these interns ? What is the official CIC > policy > > now on all those private consultants who the ICs hired and though whom > the > > PIOs route their bribes ? > > > > Sarbajit > > > > --- In [email protected] <rti_india%40yahoogroups.com><rti_india% > 40yahoogroups.com>, Sidharth > > <sidharthb...@...> wrote: > > > > > > There's an interesting news item that quotes CIC Sh. Habibullah like > > this. > > > "Shailesh Gandhi did what is restricted by government rules. You can't > do > > > that really. But he has hired someone on his own cost. If he wants to > do > > > that, he can do it but its normally not the norm of the government," > > > http://tinyurl.com/avbsq8 > > > > > > If IC SG has indulged in such an abnormal activity flouting norms then > > CIC > > > should not have allowed him to do this for all these months. > > > > > > There's no point in going to press on these. He should have stopped > these > > > activities using powers vested with him when they were started. CIC is > > > equally guilty on this. > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
