plz unplug me from rti_india.or issue only unpublished story. thanks arjun
On 24/05/2009, sroy1947 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > So the CIC has proceeded to publish the order in this case after all. > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/WB-18052009-05.pdf > > Mr Habibullah should hang his head in shame for this cover-up order. Surely > he realises that this is a serious women's right case. > > Does he think that the public of India is going to let statements like go > by default - > "We are satisfied that such information, as is held by the Rajya Sabha > Secretaariat, AT PRESENT IN THE FILE (emphasis supplied) dealing with Ms > Chhabia's complaint has in fact been provided ...." > > Did he investigate the material removed from the files which is lying in > the Vice President's chambers, and which was sought by the applicant whilst > doing his 'ercule Poirot imitation .. "We find that in no page of the file > is there any evidence of tampering of page numbers, which woud have > suggested duplication / replacement. Serial Numbers on file either > handwritten or typewritten are unvroken from 2 to 25, only page No.1 > carrying no number." ??? > > In any case what happened to disclosure of the suppressed 5 pages of File > Notings on which Mr Habibullah is silent in this disgraceful order ?? > Inspection is no substitute for "certified copies" old boy. > > And yet after this kind of DISGRACEFUL order Mr Habibullah has the god > awful cheek to publish a letter dt 11.05.2009 from the Secretary General > Rajya Sabha (addresed to "My Dear Wajahat") on his website which merrily > claims that all is well with RTI in the Rajya Sabha > > http://cic.gov.in/StudyReports/RajyaSabha.pdf > > DISGRACEFUL, DISGRACEFUL, DISGRACEFUL !!!! (I have already used "shameful" > and "sordid" in my previous post). > > PS: It seems from this letter that Mr H was an invited "expert" on RTI to > the Rajya - of the kind Shailesh Gandhi was to MCD. > > Sarbajit > > --- In [email protected] <rti_india%40yahoogroups.com>, "sroy1947" > <sroy1...@...> wrote: > > > > Who says that C'IC is above board. > > > > Now that the Chinese hackers have installed bugs in Mr Habibullah's > office (they probably want to trap him with some "harassed" lady PIOs) and > the raw transcripts are all over the Internet in real time - we can see (and > hear) everything that goes on in Mr H's office (almost as well as the > Chinese can). > > > > On 22.April.2009 Mr H passes an order in this case "CIC/WB/A/2007/01566" > some Anita Chhabra versus PIO Rajya Sabha. The (very embarrassing) order is > published on the CIC website for precisely 2 days. It concerns action taken > on a very damaging DoPT report recommending disciplinary action against > Rajya Sabha officers attached to Mr Hamid Ansari's office. > > > > On 24.April.2009 PS to Vice President makes a telecon to Mr H's office > and a new order is issued (the old order is yanked off the website) fixing a > hearing for today. This order is never published (and is also backdated to > 22.April.2009) on CIC's website. > > > > Today (after the fix is in) Mr Habibullah unilaterally accepts the plea > of Rajya Sabha's PIO that the file has "disappeared" (everyone knows that it > is lying in VP's chambers) and Mr H orders that no action should be taken. > > > > The question Mr H should now answer is this: (keeping in mind the SC/CJ > drama / farce):- > > > > "Every time there is some deeply embarrassing information - does the > Public Authority simply send it to the head of the P/A from where no PIO > dares to requisition it to give to an applicant" > > > > Very very shameful and sordid. This is another of those orders which > shall never see the light of day on CIC's website > > > > Sarbajit > > > > > -- Arjun Dev Basak Correspondent Dainik Jagran Pyare Lal bhavan Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg; ITO, New Delhi - 110002 Mobile No. 9871168195 Office Phone No. 011-43525020 Fax - 011-43525042 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
