Dear Mr Basak, This is a group for serious RTI users. Journalists are allowed to lurk if they keep quiet.
The story (Anita Chhabra versus Rajya Sabha) is unpublished. You see at this group the moderators get information BEFORE the CIC publishes it and members TUNE IN here for our crisp ANALYSIS of CIC decisions (not the PTI handouts which you boozebums lap up and publish). To unsubscribe from the group send an email to "[email protected]" Every one who is unhappy with the rude / impolite / arrogant etc etc language used on this group (especially by me) is STRONGLY encouraged to UNSUBSCRIBE. Anyone else who is unhappy with me / my unParliamentary language etc but is PASSIONATE about RTI is STRONGLY ENCOURAGED to discuss these matters on the group. Sarbajit --- In [email protected], ठरà¥à¤à¥à¤¨ दà¥à¤µ बसाठ<arjunba...@...> wrote: > > plz unplug me from rti_india.or issue only unpublished story. > thanks > arjun > > > On 24/05/2009, sroy1947 <sroy1...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > So the CIC has proceeded to publish the order in this case after all. > > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/WB-18052009-05.pdf > > > > Mr Habibullah should hang his head in shame for this cover-up order. Surely > > he realises that this is a serious women's right case. > > > > Does he think that the public of India is going to let statements like go > > by default - > > "We are satisfied that such information, as is held by the Rajya Sabha > > Secretaariat, AT PRESENT IN THE FILE (emphasis supplied) dealing with Ms > > Chhabia's complaint has in fact been provided ...." > > > > Did he investigate the material removed from the files which is lying in > > the Vice President's chambers, and which was sought by the applicant whilst > > doing his 'ercule Poirot imitation .. "We find that in no page of the file > > is there any evidence of tampering of page numbers, which woud have > > suggested duplication / replacement. Serial Numbers on file either > > handwritten or typewritten are unvroken from 2 to 25, only page No.1 > > carrying no number." ??? > > > > In any case what happened to disclosure of the suppressed 5 pages of File > > Notings on which Mr Habibullah is silent in this disgraceful order ?? > > Inspection is no substitute for "certified copies" old boy. > > > > And yet after this kind of DISGRACEFUL order Mr Habibullah has the god > > awful cheek to publish a letter dt 11.05.2009 from the Secretary General > > Rajya Sabha (addresed to "My Dear Wajahat") on his website which merrily > > claims that all is well with RTI in the Rajya Sabha > > > > http://cic.gov.in/StudyReports/RajyaSabha.pdf > > > > DISGRACEFUL, DISGRACEFUL, DISGRACEFUL !!!! (I have already used "shameful" > > and "sordid" in my previous post). > > > > PS: It seems from this letter that Mr H was an invited "expert" on RTI to > > the Rajya - of the kind Shailesh Gandhi was to MCD. > > > > Sarbajit > > > > --- In [email protected] <rti_india%40yahoogroups.com>, "sroy1947" > > <sroy1947@> wrote: > > > > > > Who says that C'IC is above board. > > > > > > Now that the Chinese hackers have installed bugs in Mr Habibullah's > > office (they probably want to trap him with some "harassed" lady PIOs) and > > the raw transcripts are all over the Internet in real time - we can see (and > > hear) everything that goes on in Mr H's office (almost as well as the > > Chinese can). > > > > > > On 22.April.2009 Mr H passes an order in this case "CIC/WB/A/2007/01566" > > some Anita Chhabra versus PIO Rajya Sabha. The (very embarrassing) order is > > published on the CIC website for precisely 2 days. It concerns action taken > > on a very damaging DoPT report recommending disciplinary action against > > Rajya Sabha officers attached to Mr Hamid Ansari's office. > > > > > > On 24.April.2009 PS to Vice President makes a telecon to Mr H's office > > and a new order is issued (the old order is yanked off the website) fixing a > > hearing for today. This order is never published (and is also backdated to > > 22.April.2009) on CIC's website. > > > > > > Today (after the fix is in) Mr Habibullah unilaterally accepts the plea > > of Rajya Sabha's PIO that the file has "disappeared" (everyone knows that it > > is lying in VP's chambers) and Mr H orders that no action should be taken. > > > > > > The question Mr H should now answer is this: (keeping in mind the SC/CJ > > drama / farce):- > > > > > > "Every time there is some deeply embarrassing information - does the > > Public Authority simply send it to the head of the P/A from where no PIO > > dares to requisition it to give to an applicant" > > > > > > Very very shameful and sordid. This is another of those orders which > > shall never see the light of day on CIC's website > > > > > > Sarbajit > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Arjun Dev Basak > Correspondent > Dainik Jagran > Pyare Lal bhavan > Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg; > ITO, New Delhi - 110002 > Mobile No. 9871168195 > Office Phone No. 011-43525020 > Fax - 011-43525042 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
