Dear Sidharth I have already filed complain u/s 18 and will file RTI application under RTI to PIO of SIC office asking for progress report on my complain, but as you rightly pointed out that Suresh Joshi will himself take the hearing, at aleast the train will start moving, Writ Petition is costly and verdict will be that SIC to take hearing within 15 days I will be writting to Governor first before putting a RTI application. Rgds Leslie Almeida
--- On Mon, 7/6/09, Sidharth <[email protected]> wrote: From: Sidharth <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [rti_india] 7 2nd appeal hearings kept in the morgue To: [email protected] Date: Monday, July 6, 2009, 9:47 AM Complaint under Sec 18 Against whom? CIC ! Who wil hear this case ? Joshi himself ? RTI application before the CPIO of the SIC. For what ? What information can be sought? Will it hasten the hearings? Options 3 & 4 given by Dr Arun are better option. Sidharth Misra On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Arun Agrawal <arun_agrawal@ yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Sir: > > This is a legal issue and CANNOT be taken before a consumer court . > > You actually have several options : > > 1. File complaint under Sec 18 > > 2. File RTI application before the CPIO of the SIC. (Recommended) > > 3. File WP in High Court - however you need a lawyer to draft and file > the petition, arguments can be done by you > > 4. A complaint to the Governor ( for whatever it is worth ) . > > Please keep all the members informed . > > Dr Arun Agrawal > > My 7 hearing some way back in oct 2008 order is 'DECISION TO BE TAKEN" > > VAGUE ANSWER BY SHRI SURESH JOSHI SIC Mumbai > > when will this decision be taken, i have filed complain u/s 18 and > will follow up with application under RTI to PIO of SIC office this > worked > > once before. > > as someone advised me that filing a case in consumer court > > against Suresh Joshi is a better way out i will be explore the > possibility to that angle, will take advise from Adv.Dr Kamath of > Consumer guidance socity near V.T. a veterian in consumer laws, fighting > a clear cut case > > is cheap at consumer courts, and one can fight one's battle no need of > a lawyer. as per sec 32 of Advocates act one can fight cases in H.C also > > if one is well versed with the law > > > > > > Leslie Almeida > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
