Jan, > I may have missed that point. But if the original code already uses > schedule_work, there is likely not much to gain via an RT task: when it > triggers, RT systems are typically already broken. > > I have no problem with error detection, also error recovery. We should > just avoid over-designing (note that every RT task in a system has a > design cost /wrt RT).
The schedule_work may be invoked from a RT context so I thought prudent to use a semaphore and an RT task (txTimeoutTaxk). I don't understand the interactions between Linux's delayed-work scheme (NAPI, schedule_work, timers) and RATI/etc so I reckoned I mode it all to RTAI. Regards, Vlad
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
