Hello, again:

Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/15/2016 12:35 AM:



Dne 14.9.2016 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, Vít:

Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/13/2016 12:01 AM:
When I did the last snapshot, I mentioned, that Tcl/Tk was moved into
gem. But upstream took step further and dropped the Tcl/Tk support from
the Ruby stdlib entirely. The tk gem is the only option now. Hence I
dropped the subpackage as well. The only caveat is that there is not
good place to obsolete this package. I figured out that I place the
obsoletes into ruby-libs to remove the ruby-tcltk package from the
system, but if you have any better idea, please let me know.

Perhaps packaging ruby/tk is the smartest:
https://github.com/ruby/tk

Looks like the git log or so, the above seems to be exactly the
replacement
for previously rubylib Tcl/Tk.

Yes, it should be drop in replacement as far as I understand it.

If you don't have time, I may try packaging in a week or two weeks.

If I am not mistaken, there is nothing in Fedora, what would depend on
ruby-tcltk, so for me it is very little priority. Thank you if you are
going to pickup the maintenance.


Sorry for very looooooong delay, however not I've submitted
review request for rubygem-tk:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409355

I have another review request for rubygem-clutter-gdk :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409288

Review swap is welcomed.

Regards,
Mamoru

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to