Christopher Williams wrote: > On 1/22/07, Werner Schuster (murphee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> VM - I have two (Standard, JRuby) and was surprised that the OK >> button wouldn't get activated - until I chose something from the >> combo box; > The Add VM Dialog seems a bit too strict about having the user choose a > > Do you mean until you checked one of the boxes? Never mind, it seems to have been fixed in the current trunk. Another issue: I'm not quite sure how the lookup system for different VMs works - it seems like it tries to lookup some VM configuration based on the project, and if it can't find anything there, it falls back to the DefaultVM (which is the one checked in the Ruby Interpreter Prefs). This means: - I have a C/Ruby Interpreter set as the Default VM - I have JRuby Interpreter set up - when I do a Launch and tell it to use JRuby, this lookup system will fail and just return the Default VM; If you want to see how additional VMs behave in the GUI or interact with the VM system, my JRuby stuff is available at: :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs/rdt-jruby >> I saw some locations you marked with some comment about Not knowing how >> to quickly start Ruby (I think it was somewhere concerned with Ri). >> I didn't quite get that; > In a few locations we start up ri and rdoc. Before we used to get a > handle > on the default VM and execute it that way. Now with the new API that > won't > fly so for a while I wasn't sure how to fix it. I did manage to figure > out a > way to execute those now. Great; Just for the record: a Standard C/Ruby needs to be used for the RI and Rdoc features; I once set a JRuby installation as my default Ruby Interpreter, and the Ri/RDoc features broke (seems like Ri doesn't work in JRuby) and there were frequent 100% CPU usage periods, which came from the TextHover launching JRuby (heavyweight...) and trying to get the Ri for some code. Question: What timeframe for a release do you have in mind? I'm mostly interested if you want to add some more stuff before 0.9 or if the current state == 0.9 (of course, after the changes had some time to settle down); I'd like to add some small extension points (QuickAssists/QuickFixes and an Extension point that might allow to add more "Compilers" to the Builder process). These could go into 1.0, if the 0.9 release is too close, but they shouldn't interact badly with the RDT features. murphee -- Blog @ http://jroller.com/page/murphee Maintainer of EclipseShell @ http://eclipse-shell.sourceforge.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
