On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Nick Quaranto<n...@quaran.to> wrote:
> Please note I'm not suggesting that all of these happen *this instant*, I
> just want to open up discussion about making this happen and what would be
> involved. Your thoughts and comments would be appreciated.

To be honest, this seems Not Ready For Prime Time:

* Pagination/sorting is wrong and broken
* Project pages contain obviously broken/incorrect links (version and
homepage links)
* Project pages seem to have much less information than I have on
RubyForge.  No release notes, individual file links (.gem, .tar, etc),
etc...   (broken and less != transparent and accessible)
* I uploaded a gem to RubyForge yesterday just before midnight, it is
still not mirrored sixteen hours later (and it was available almost
immediately on Rubyforge, which shows their mirror process is working
very well)

That's just what I found in one minute of poking around, it doesn't
give me a good feeling for the overall quality and stability of the
effort.  I'm also concerned about long-term support.  No offense to
you, but Tom Copeland is a machine, he is always there to support
Rubyforge, year after year...

In general, if it Ain't Broken, Don't Fix It - and think especially
hard if the replacement isn't a no-brainer out-of-the-park homerun...

Is there a reason we can't get many of these benefits from
RubyForge.org?  For example, your API seems like a good idea, but why
can't it be a wrapper or enhancement to the current RubyGems/RubyForge
ecosystem?  A Gem plugin, even?

Finally, I don't see why there needs to be a change to the canonical
source, since Rubyforge isn't even really one anymore.  That ship has
already sailed, many people don't even publish gems to RubyForge, they
just use Github or their own servers.  If anything there needs to be
better support for multiple sources (There are good ideas here not yet
implemented).  The multiple-naming problem is a bigger but related
issue as Eric discussed
(http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2009/02/04/a-rubygems-github-proposal)...

-- Chad
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to