On Aug 26, 2009, at 17:16 , Luis Lavena wrote:
(possibly) even better, I'm pretty sure we could get Tom convinced
that
gemcutter is a good idea and we should migrate rubyforge to it.
The thing is that RubyForge is more than just gems.
I wasn't suggesting that gemcutter take over rubyforge, but that
rubyforge migrate to using gemcutter for gem services. With a little
bit of work, it wouldn't be hard to do.
Taking in consideration there are lot of gems with more than 10K of
downloads, the incurring charge of running that form S3 and adding
CloudFront CDN on top will need to be payed my someone.
There is no incurred charge if S3 is not involved. That is one benefit
of having it brought under the wing of ruby central / rubyforge.
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
