On 10 Sep 2008, at 15:13, MalHayn wrote:
> > Hi, > > Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc > type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. > > > I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for > themselves. > > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html > > > The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within > the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. > > When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But > the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when > using Firefox 3.0.1. > > MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. > > Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects > properly. > > Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win > XP Pro. > > > Any other ideas? > Does it change if you fix the embed/param tag (there's no closing tag which could be triggering some funky quirks mode thing)? Fred > > > > On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is >>> it something like a different content-type or doc type is >>> triggering a >>> change in browser behaviour? >> >>> Fred >> >> Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule >> from rails stylesheet gets involved. >> >> Regards, >> Rimantas >> --http://rimantas.com/ > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
