On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Conrad Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Frederick Cheung < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 10 Sep 2008, at 15:13, MalHayn wrote: >> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc >> > type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. >> > >> > >> > I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for >> > themselves. >> > >> > http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html >> > >> > >> > The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within >> > the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. >> > >> > When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But >> > the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when >> > using Firefox 3.0.1. >> > >> > MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. >> > >> > Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects >> > properly. >> > >> > Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win >> > XP Pro. >> > >> > >> > Any other ideas? >> > >> >> Does it change if you fix the embed/param tag (there's no closing tag >> which could be triggering some funky quirks mode thing)? >> >> Fred >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is >> >>> it something like a different content-type or doc type is >> >>> triggering a >> >>> change in browser behaviour? >> >> >> >>> Fred >> >> >> >> Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule >> >> from rails stylesheet gets involved. >> >> >> > > Hi, Fred brings up a very good point because some browsers may not be able > to > recover from HTML coding errors. Thus, there were 13 errors within your > HTML > code that you mention in the above. You should fix all the errors and > warnings > within your HTML by using the following page: > > http://validator.w3.org/check > http://validator.w3.org/ > > Good luck, > > -Conrad > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
