Hi Guys, Thanks for the input.
Rework the code to reduce the css error messages to 4, but problem still remains. Embedded objects are reduce by about 91%. Here is the reworked code... http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/demo.html When reviewing the two "source codes" output from Firefox 3.0.1 under Rails and the html version, both are exactly the same. Weird! I posted this over on Mozilla. No response yet. > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Conrad Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Frederick Cheung < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On 10 Sep 2008, at 15:13, MalHayn wrote: > > >> > Hi, > > >> > Good points, but there is nothing different with content-type or doc > >> > type or any of the code. And the stylesheets have been removed. > > >> > I have posted the entire webpage code online so other can test for > >> > themselves. > > >> >http://www.clarions.com/test/rails_firefox_object_bug/index.html > > >> > The webpage code was saved as demo.html, as well as, demo.rhtml within > >> > the layout directory of the rails app. Each page is exactly the same. > > >> > When using Firefox 3.0.1 the html version displays as it should. But > >> > the rails rhtml version reduces the embedded object by about 91% when > >> > using Firefox 3.0.1. > > >> > MSIE, Opera, Safari display the embedded object at 100% size. > > >> > Prior upgrading to version 3.0, Firefox displayed the embedded objects > >> > properly. > > >> > Using: Rails 2.0.2, Mongrel 1.1.2, Ruby 1.8.6, Instant Rails 2.0. Win > >> > XP Pro. > > >> > Any other ideas? > > >> Does it change if you fix the embed/param tag (there's no closing tag > >> which could be triggering some funky quirks mode thing)? > > >> Fred > > >> > On Sep 10, 4:05 pm, "Rimantas Liubertas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>> How does the html generated via rails and the static file differ. Is > >> >>> it something like a different content-type or doc type is > >> >>> triggering a > >> >>> change in browser behaviour? > > >> >>> Fred > > >> >> Yes, I am thinking along the same lines. Most likely some CSS rule > >> >> from rails stylesheet gets involved. > > > Hi, Fred brings up a very good point because some browsers may not be able > > to > > recover from HTML coding errors. Thus, there were 13 errors within your > > HTML > > code that you mention in the above. You should fix all the errors and > > warnings > > within your HTML by using the following page: > > >http://validator.w3.org/check > > http://validator.w3.org/ > > > > > Good luck, > > > -Conrad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
