On 07/25, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > 25.07.2014, 18:58, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: > > On 7/24/2014 10:25 PM, UpdatesD Cron wrote: > >> Exit Status 9 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example. > > Still starved > > > > HAM: 155992 (150000 required) > > SPAM: 73537 (150000 required) > > Insufficient spam corpus to generate scores; aborting. > > Exit Status 9 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example > > > > > How come the "Rule updates are old" message posted to "dev" says there > are are plenty of both HAM and SPAM?
The short answer is because http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140724 says so. Of course, the explanation of the difference is generally more interesting. On 07/25, [email protected] wrote: > SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2014-07-13. > SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2014-07-13. > SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2014-07-13. > > 20140724: Spam and ham are above threshold of 150,000: > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140724 > 20140724: Spam: 485759, Ham: 162179 > > > The spam and ham counts on which this script alerts are from > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140724 > Click "(source details)" (it's tiny and low contrast). > It's from the second and third columns of the line that ends with > "(all messages)" > > The source to this script is > http://www.chaosreigns.com/sa/update-version-mon.pl
