I agree. However I'd prefer the maven notation: <artifact>-<version>, so this very file would be called:
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.war On 05/08/2010, at 12:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote: > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can > differentiate. > > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? > > > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote: >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default >> url >> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a >> mistake or intended? > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. > As > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in > another archive. > > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip. > > What do people want? > > Mark >> Cheers, >> Jervis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Bruno Unna Public key available _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
