..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
________________________________
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: 05 August 2010 12:06
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and
then unzip the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory...
confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
<[email protected]> wrote:
So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
(Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
________________________________
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:47
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles
for OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this
(but want to set the web context or rename when deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael
(M.) wrote:
> I like the new format - I like version
numbers in filenames so you can
> differentiate.
>
> I can always change the web-context at
deployment time if I like.
Previuosly it was
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
-- drools-guvnor.war
So the zip was versioned, just the
contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
the point in zipping a single war. But I
can move back to that, so the
main download artifact is versioned, but
the war isn't....
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
[email protected]
>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1
war file is now namedas
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
>
> On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu
wrote:
>> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war
file is now named as
>> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way
users have to change the default url
>> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>> mistake or intended?
> Previously it was a versioned zip that
had an unversioned war in it. As
> a war is already compressed it seemed
pointless compressing it in
> another archive.
>
> Users can just rename the .war if they
like, stripping the version. Or
> we can change it back to placing hte
.war inside of the .zip.
>
> What do people want?
>
> Mark
>> Cheers,
>> Jervis
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
