no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <[email protected]>wrote: > So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then? > > (Says he with little experience of maven packaging) > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale > *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47 > *To:* Rules Dev List > *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now > namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? > > yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know > tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web > context or rename when deploying !). > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote: >> > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can >> > differentiate. >> > >> > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like. >> Previuosly it was >> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip >> -- drools-guvnor.war >> >> So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see >> the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the >> main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't.... >> >> Mark >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [email protected] >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor >> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15 >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas >> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? >> > >> > >> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote: >> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as >> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url >> >> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a >> >> mistake or intended? >> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. As >> > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in >> > another archive. >> > >> > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or >> > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip. >> > >> > What do people want? >> > >> > Mark >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jervis >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> rules-dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Michael D Neale > home: www.michaelneale.net > blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > -- Michael D Neale home: www.michaelneale.net blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
