This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)

Mark
On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
thankfully it didn't do that...

but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough enough times that I still remember it.

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of
        *Michael Neale
        *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
        *To:* Rules Dev List
        *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
        nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?

        no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip,
        and then unzip the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor
        directory... confuses people.

        Distributing it as a war makes sense.

        On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
            (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)

                
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                *From:* [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                [mailto:[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf
                Of *Michael Neale
                *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
                *To:* Rules Dev List
                *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
                namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?

                yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X
                users (I know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do
                this (but want to set the web context or rename when
                deploying !).

                On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
                <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                wrote:

                     On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
                    > I like the new format - I like version numbers
                    in filenames so you can
                    > differentiate.
                    >
                    > I can always change the web-context at
                    deployment time if I like.
                    Previuosly it was
                    drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
                     -- drools-guvnor.war

                    So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war
                    wasn't. I didn't see
                    the point in zipping a single war. But I can move
                    back to that, so the
                    main download artifact is versioned, but the war
                    isn't....

                    Mark
                    > -----Original Message-----
                    > From: [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    > [mailto:[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>] On
                    Behalf Of Mark Proctor
                    > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
                    > To: [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
                    now namedas
                    > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
                    >
                    >
                    >    On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
                    >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
                    named as
                    >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to
                    change the default url
                    >> to things like
                    http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
                    >> mistake or intended?
                    > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an
                    unversioned war in it. As
                    > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless
                    compressing it in
                    > another archive.
                    >
                    > Users can just rename the .war if they like,
                    stripping the version. Or
                    > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside
                    of the .zip.
                    >
                    > What do people want?
                    >
                    > Mark
                    >> Cheers,
                    >> Jervis
                    >>
                    >> _______________________________________________
                    >> rules-dev mailing list
                    >> [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
                    >>
                    >>
                    >
                    > _______________________________________________
                    > rules-dev mailing list
                    > [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
                    >
                    > _______________________________________________
                    > rules-dev mailing list
                    > [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
                    >
                    >


                    _______________________________________________
                    rules-dev mailing list
                    [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




-- Michael D Neale
                home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
                blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
                <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>


            _______________________________________________
            rules-dev mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




-- Michael D Neale
        home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
        blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>


    _______________________________________________
    rules-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>


_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to