Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:28:54AM +0100, Frank Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> > If you can't be bothered for simple and obvious things like following the >> > *existing* coding style of a project, then I can't be bothered to waste >> > time on your patch, really. >> >> Let's stop the discussion here. > > You see, your behaviour boils down to this: first you agree to finish the > patch > after fixing the syntax. I then invest a lot of time into it, and the result > is you not complying and calling me nitpicking. > > If you think that behaviour is fine, I am surprised, but that's how is it. > It's up to you to think about it. Maybe you shouldn't agree to something > if you can't be bothered to go through with it and all you cna do is > insult people when they call in what you agreed to.
I really tried to follow your wishes. I did not want to annoy you and I'm sorry that I did by not preparing the patch carefully enough. However, I was annoyed, too that you insisted that e.g. the ASImage *im = file2ASImage(rs [Rs_iconfile], 0xFFFFFFFF, SCREEN_GAMMA, 0, NULL); was wrong while it definitely wasn't and didn't get that you not only wanted GNU style curly braces and a space before the ( and around = but also spaces around arithmetic symbols. If you had just told me that yesterday, things would have gone a much smoother way. Of course if I had looked at the existing code more carefully, that would have been the case too. So, again: Sorry. Frank -- Have you ever considered how much text can fit in eighty columns? Given that a signature typically contains up to four lines of text, this space allows you to attach a tremendous amount of valuable information to your messages. Seize the opportunity and don't waste your signature on bullshit that nobody cares about. _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
