It's been quite some time since we talked about our layouts, so let us know 
what you have and why you built it that way (or how you plan to build it).  
What would you do differently if you could start over?

In my case, I have a planned layout in an area about 11 x 35 and am planning on 
an around the wall layout.  I never thought much of this until Jim Six happened 
to move nearby and I've been helping him on his 11 x 55 around the wall layout 
(in HO unfortunately).  I was impressed with the looks of it, and especially 
the cost of the benchwork (under 350 bucks total for wood, foamboard, ceiling 
tile and drywall screws) and no legs to trip over!  This layout uses a 
foamboard base with ceiling tiles on top and it is probably the quietest layout 
I've ever heard.  I'll be using the same process on my Winona Railroad in 
northern Indiana in early 1947, so will have some hills, but not much 
elevation.  Photos of Jim's construction techniques are at 
<http://s22.photobucket.com/albums/b337/jsix/?start=all> - my Surfoam is even 
pictured! <vbg>

At least one of our group members has also visited Jim's layout - it would be 
interesting to hear his perspective.  He was there in the early construction 
phase I believe.

I'm still evaluating handlaying vs. flextrack.  I just realized I planned to 
order some track in April for evaluation and still haven't gotten around to it. 
 I've always leaned towards handlaying, but there is some very nice flextrack 
out now.  I'll likely be using code 70.  The Winona was a former interurban, 
and some of the original track was used its entire life.  She had 2 GE 44 
tonners, a couple propane electrics and a critter.

I tend to be a perfectionist, which has really held me back, but I'm starting 
to learn to just do it.  I fell in love with the Toledo & Ohio Central (NYC 
Lines) years ago and wanted to model it, but the perfect branch line (east part 
of the St. Marys branch from outside Columbus, OH to Bellefontaine) was 
abandoned in 1948 (not used much for many years prior), the west part was 
abandoned on 4/1/76, taking 2 days and 3 derailments for the final run (less 
than 30 miles) but this didn't have what I wanted.  The two mainlines (today's 
NS West Virginia Secondary) had lots of chemical and coal traffic which I 
loved, but I don't have the space for it.  Then while doing research for Jim's 
Big Four, I realized the parallel Winona had everything I loved.  Lots of tank 
cars (two bulk oil distributors), hoppers (3300 car loads of sand and gravel a 
year to the Wabash), egg traffic (the only cars the line had for interchange 
were reefers) and other unusual businesses.  There were also 7 interchanges 
with major lines in its 66 mile length (off the top of my head, NYC, PRR, B&O, 
Erie, Wabash (twice), NKP).

What have I learned so far?  To help on other layouts so my misteaks are made 
on their layouts. <vbg>  The disadvantage to this is my modeling time is taken 
up on other layouts.  I've helped on one HO layout weekly for over 17 years 
now, and been with Jim for 2 years now at least once a week.  I also have 4 
kids (and a wife), so don't have much other free time for my layout.  It also 
helps to be around others that challenge your thinking. <vbg>

Mark Plank

-- 
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to