Yes, I sent an e-mail early this morning too. Sam "the answer man"
from Kadee came back with a question about what the prototype size of
a type E coupler is. That seemed like a strange question from a
company that specializes in couplers. They more than anyone should
know what the prototype size of a type E coupler is...
I have just switched from N-scale, so I, too, am facing the decision
as to which coupler to standardize my equipment on. In N-scale I used
Micro-Trains' Z-scale coupler because it operated like the N-scale
one, but it was closer to prototype size. I, for one, want both
features: true-to-scale and usable in operating sessions. If it is
possible in N-scale, I would imagine it should be possible in S-scale.
Just my $0.02...
Peter.
At 02:01 pm 09/03/2008, you wrote:
>Rhett Graves
>(getting into this deeper than he wanted to)
------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Vanvliet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.fourthray.com/
http://www.fourthray.com/Peter/
Houston, Texas
------------------------------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
