I have been lighting my layout area exclusively with CFL's, the equivalent of a 
100W light bulb. The lighting has been adequate, though not outstanding in the 
area of special effects, etc.

Bob Nicholson  _____________________________________________



--- In [email protected], Bob Werre <b...@...> wrote:
>
> Although time doesn't let me read all the info on your link, from a 
> photographer's point of view much of what was said was correct, but some 
> wasn't.    The talk about 5000k being ideal for photography is only that 
> because sunlight is generally just a bit cooler at 5500K--not much of a 
> difference.  There is also mention of 3000K being used for what is 
> commonly known as photofloods.  The lights that he might be referring to 
> were actually 3400K with Kodak's Kodachrome Type A being the only film 
> made in recent history--now obsolete.  Typical photography 'hot' lights 
> were in the 3200K range in either a tungsten or quartz varieties.  They 
> are still in common use, fairly cheap and durable.  When it comes to a 
> Kelvin rating on fluorescent tubes--technically there isn't a rating but 
> there are great differences in the color rendering.  The newer compact 
> bulbs are generally better for viewing and photography purposes.
> 
> Again from a photographer's standpoint the typical overhead valance is a 
> real 'bugger' to deal with.  Let me explain,  it's typical to have the 
> valance drop down at the edge of the layout.  This causes the front 
> elements in the layout to often be in shadow as the lighting is coming 
> down in a 12 o'clock noon pattern--typically the worst time in the day 
> for lighting.  So when guys like us come in we see all these dark 
> shadows up front; we try and light the area, but the valence is now in 
> the way.  This is compounded if the layout is double decked.  I recently 
> worked on such a layout where the trees and buildings were only a couple 
> of inches from the fluorescent tubes.  If you us the laws of physics, 
> you will figure out that the lighting on the top of a building might be 
> 10x what the lighting might be on the 'ground' thus making the layout 
> very uneven. 
> 
> General rule thumb, if your going to do a valance, put it out front by a 
> foot or two--probably just about above the typical viewer.  It's 
> generally okay to have lights in the back of the layout also, but keep 
> some up front. 
> 
> My layout is lit by fluorescent tubes most of the time, but I do have 
> track lighting with floods and spots that I use to put emphasis in key 
> areas.  I hope they make replacement LED's that are inexpensive (I view 
> the CFL's as a temporary solution), because the heat is certainly a factor.
> 
> Bob Werre
> BobWphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeff Ngowe wrote:
> 
> >  
> >
> > For all you who don't know the intricacies of layout lighting. I 
> > recommend you read Bob Sobol's forum post here 
> > http://www.aorailroad.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=133. 
> > <http://www.aorailroad.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=133.>
> > Jeff
> >
> > --- In [email protected] <mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com>, 
> > "ctxmf74" <ctxm@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com>, 
> > "mhrywest" <mhry19@> wrote:
> > > >now it can be done on one circuit saving money for lights and for 
> > cooling because of all the heat the incandescent lights put out. I 
> > need to do more investigation into exact costs and benefits.
> > > >
> >
> > ur passions! Explore new interests. 
> > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15o2rrji0/M=493064.14012770.13963757.13298430/D=groups/S=1706533818:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1283115612/L=a6fa9346-b39f-11df-9902-07d90afe3646/B=SNdOVmKImnY-/J=1283108412738942/K=Y.bIKabAZk_xYmJh4UO34Q/A=6015306/R=0/SIG=11vlkvigg/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/hobbiesandactivitieszone/>
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups 
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjbnRwMDE0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzI1MjE5MARncnBzcElkAzE3MDY1MzM4MTgEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEyODMxMDg0MTE->
> >  
> >
> > Switch to: Text-Only 
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=change%20delivery%20format:%20Traditional>,
> >  
> > Daily Digest 
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=email%20delivery:%20Digest> 
> > . Unsubscribe 
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> . 
> > Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > .
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to