If you're comparing Atlas HO to S, there is no comparison in S.  If you move 
over to Atlas O, S Helper Service is only a #5 and #7 turnout away.  Atlas O is 
code 148, so S Helper's hefty rail fits right in.  Its a little to heavy for 
me, but a whole lot of folks would compromise if the larger numbered turnouts 
were available.


Ed Kozlowsky
Sanford, Maine

--- On Sat, 2/12/11, pickycat95 <[email protected]> wrote:


From: pickycat95 <[email protected]>
Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: (was S Philosophy) now is NEED for 
flex-track-compatible Motorized Turnouts
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 6:22 PM


  




Where does one start in this conversation? I agree with Dave that motorized is 
potentially a separate but related issue. If we confine ourselves to 'scale' - 
code 100 or smaller there is Shinohara #8 and #6 on plastic ties. The #6 has 
issues and perhaps providing 'assistance' to retool it may be a place to start. 
Tomalco has it's own glued to wood ties thus avoiding tooling for ties 
altogether and that allows for multiple rail weights. Quite clever but 
weathering is required to blend the wood switch ties to the plastic flex ties.

Otherwise the scale/gauge seems too balkanized for an economically viable 
solution. What constitutes 'scale'? Is SHS' fine effort to bridge the gap from 
hi-rail to scale to be left out? A suite of switches, crossings and what not 
would greatly increase it's appeal to many considering their flex track 
product. 

Hi-rail wise SHS has it's #4, AM has it's 27" radius for code 148 as does Am. 
S-Gauge for it's code 172. Gargraves has it's own switches and etc.

Heading down to the basement to start fabrication of another turnout for a 
passing siding. #8 BTW. 
Ben Trousdale

--- In [email protected], "ctxmf74" <ctxm@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], tennsgauge@ wrote:
> >
> > I agree completely with Dick on the need for flex-track-compatible 
> > motorized turnouts. The lack of this is bound to turn away a number of 
> > converts. 
> 
> Well, HO and N gaugers would certainly want flextrack compatible turnouts if 
> they were thinking of switching to S but they wouldn't want them motorized. 
> All scale modelers are used to installing their own switch throw mechanism , 
> either a tortoise style motor or a bluepoint hand throw or a caboose ground 
> throw typically. Motorized turnouts are more from the three rail O or Kato 
> unitrack realm. A line of flextrack compatable code 100 DCC ready scale 
> turnouts in #5 and #7 frog angles similiar to the Atlas or Microengineering 
> HO product would be a nice place to start....dave
>








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to