You get no argument from me on that one. I was only pointing to the "model railroader" - "railroad modeler" distinction. Some folks are driven by the principle' "If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing". And that, my friend, will always get the attention. Ed Kozlowsky Sanford, Maine --- On Mon, 6/6/11, westfield_depot <[email protected]> wrote:
From: westfield_depot <[email protected]> Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: Recent Podcasts Got me Thinking To: [email protected] Date: Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:07 AM I disagree to an extent. Yes, it is a philosophy but when you look at the work of many of the outstanding railroad modelers out there at narrow gauge conventions, or craftsman structure shows, or in some of the narrow gauge or fine modeling annuals it's the details that are lauded. I'd say that community has become obsessed with details. When you start putting muddy foot prints on your running boards you are obsessed with detail. Chris Borgmeyer --- In [email protected], Ed Kozlowsky <soldado7264@...> wrote: > > I don't think the term "railroad modeler" has anything to do with the level > of detail, but rather with a general philosophy... >  > Ed Kozlowsky > Sanford, Maine >  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
