> code 100 would be a little on the small side! I understand
>
that Cleveland once sold some #115 size rail, which would be nearly
> perfect.
>
I have a thin slice of local rail, which
makes it easy to measure. It translates to .112 or .113 in S (132 pound
prototype?).
Stan Stokrocki
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Re: {S-Scale List} back in the day? raisinone
- Re: {S-Scale List} back in the day? up148
- Re: {S-Scale List} rail spacers? Bob Werre
- Re: {S-Scale List} rail spacers? Talmadge C 'TC' Carr
- Re: {S-Scale List} rail spacers? Bob Werre
- {S-Scale List} Rail height Tom Hawley
- Re: {S-Scale List} Rail height Talmadge C 'TC' Carr
- Re: {S-Scale List} Rail height Bob Werre
- Re: {S-Scale List} Rail height Gale Hall
- Re: {S-Scale List} Rail height Bob Werre
- Re: {S-Scale List} Rail height sscale
- {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height Pieter Roos
- Re: {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height Gale Hall
- RE: {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height David Heine
- Re: {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height Bob Werre
- Re: {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height Pieter Roos
- RE: {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height David Heine
- {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height David
- Re: {S-Scale List} Re: Rail height John
- {S-Scale List} Re: Code Wheels shabbona_rr
- Re: {S-Scale List} Re: Code Wheels John Degnan
