I guess that makes more sense, glad I didn't do the math! But it also
says that code 100 would be a little on the small side! I understand
that Cleveland once sold some #115 size rail, which would be nearly perfect.
I have measured the middle sized (KCS) and it comes out to 90. while the
MILW comes in at 60 which is what I was told. The actual rail sample is
about #40, so it could have been used for early 3' running.
Bob Werre
On 12/15/11 2:46 PM, Tom Hawley wrote:
>
> As you can see it's nearly 7" high.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Talmadge C 'TC' Carr
>
> Thats around code 130
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> -----------Response-----------
> The gentleman forgets that our scale is one to 64, and that the code is
> derived from the rail height. 7 divided by 64 gives a "code" of about 110.
>
> Tom Hawley -- Lansing Mich
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
