Avoiding the use of names, one candidate plans to raise taxes nearly 20% by allowing the so-called "Bush tax cuts" to expire. If, like me, you don't make enough money to be affected directly by these cuts, you're boss(es) and client(s) will be affected, which means that you WILL BE AFFECTED with less raises, and less contracts.
If you're an `S'-scale modeler, that means a smaller house (or none at all) and therefore a smaller layout, and less money for trains. Furthermore, this unnamed candidate has presided over a longer period of 8% plus unemployment then all other Presidents since WWII (a situation that could easily have been rectified by merely sitting back and NOT BLOCKING PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECTS, like the Keystone pipeline). Any S-scalers caught in this wave of unemployment would be less able to participate in our hobby. On the other hand, the other candidate has the private sector experience to grow the economy and provide those S-scalers who wish to work (as well as everyone else who wishes to work), with the opportunities to do so and earn the money necessary to engage in their hobbies (and basic needs of life). --- In [email protected], "Ed" <Loizeaux@...> wrote: > > > My wife and I will be voting. > > Tom > > > VOTE! > > Which candiate will do more for S scale? I have not heard this discussed in > any of the debates. Thoughts? ......Ed L. > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
