>From the "housing perspective" (I am a broker) you would never believe the 
>amount of daily calls I get.  Folks unable to qualify for mortgage loans, 
>others losing their homes, etc.  despite what you might read, this is a 5 to 
>10 year fix, if ever.
Simply stated, those big basements aren't available and therefore less room for 
the bigger scales, including S.  
How 'bout that, I didn't get political, although I have very strong opinions in 
that regard.  Hopefully, next Tuesday will see the beginning of a better 
business climate for all of our businesses.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 29, 2012, at 2:24 PM, "empirebuilderjjhill" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Avoiding the use of names, one candidate plans to raise taxes nearly 20% by 
> allowing the so-called "Bush tax cuts" to expire. If, like me, you don't make 
> enough money to be affected directly by these cuts, you're boss(es) and 
> client(s) will be affected, which means that you WILL BE AFFECTED with less 
> raises, and less contracts.
> 
> If you're an `S'-scale modeler, that means a smaller house (or none at all) 
> and therefore a smaller layout, and less money for trains.
> 
> Furthermore, this unnamed candidate has presided over a longer period of 8% 
> plus unemployment then all other Presidents since WWII (a situation that 
> could easily have been rectified by merely sitting back and NOT BLOCKING 
> PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECTS, like the Keystone pipeline). Any S-scalers caught in 
> this wave of unemployment would be less able to participate in our hobby.
> 
> On the other hand, the other candidate has the private sector experience to 
> grow the economy and provide those S-scalers who wish to work (as well as 
> everyone else who wishes to work), with the opportunities to do so and earn 
> the money necessary to engage in their hobbies (and basic needs of life).
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Ed" <Loizeaux@...> wrote:
> >
> > > My wife and I will be voting.
> > > Tom
> > 
> > > VOTE!
> > 
> > Which candiate will do more for S scale?  I have not heard this discussed 
> > in any of the debates. Thoughts? ......Ed L.
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to