From: Alan Lambert
         Fort Worth, Texas
 
Mark,
 
Take what I have said before. For Lionel to truely get into the scale side of S 
guage they need to know how many out there of us that want scale offerings to 
happen there are, then just wait and see like Ed said.
      Alan Lambert
 

________________________________
 From: Mark Mugnai <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: Getting it "correct"
   
 
   
 
Ed

Point taken, but I feel you might have quoted the entire line I wrote, about 
how I appreciate Lionel making an effort to "scale-ize (is that even a word?) 
some of their offerings".
I also think I used the word "probably" in there somewhere, but no, I'm not 
"really sure there will not be a scale model somewhere in the lineup at that 
time".
I didn't realize I was making a "public assertion without some factual 
evidence".
My apologies to all, including Lionel.

Mark Mugnai

--- In mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com, "Ed" <Loizeaux@...> wrote:
>
> > it's probably not likely we'll see a truly scale model from them.
> > Mark Mugnai
> 
> 
> Mark....
> 
> Check out Lionel's new cylindrical hopper.  Except for wheels and couplers, 
> it is a scale model.  The pad already exists to mount a Kadee coupler.  New 
> wheels from NWSL (if they fit?) and you will have a scale model.  Futuristic 
> assumptions about Lionel, or anyone else, are sometimes prone to error. 
> 
> Nobody can predict the future.  What Lionel will offer in two year's time is 
> unknown.  Decisions are being made today for products that will become 
> reality in your hands for Christmas 2014.  Are you really sure there will not 
> be a scale model somewhere in the lineup at that time? 
> 
> Incremental movement toward scale is fine with me.  Scale wheels, DCC, etc. 
> are now a reality.  I would agree that instant offerings of fine-scale 
> PBL-like products is unlikely.
> 
> I'm not trying to be difficult, but we can at least give them the benefit of 
> the trend line (a bit more scale each year) and not make public assertions 
> without some factual evidence. 
> 
> Just another epistle -- don't mind me.
> 
> Cheers...Ed L.
>

   
         

Reply via email to