Yes "he" did. but I told him to get the cuves and space between sections of layouts he designed smaller and the modelers would have smaller curves at their waist lines
John Armstrong (our families were relatives prior to the Revolution) ----- Original Message ----- From: gsc3 To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2012 10:48 PM Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: Minimum Radius for Passenger Cars A major factor is whether we build our layouts for operations or for railfaning. However, John Armstrong suggested that we could get away with tigher curves if they were viewed from the inside of the curve. Curves viewed from the outside of the curve are worst offenders. George Courtney --- In [email protected], "raisinone" <raisinone@...> wrote: > > Rhett: > I think there are two separate issues here: technical and visual. On the technical side, using spiral easements will ease cars through tight radius curves: 30 - 33 - 36". They will run fine but visually they will still look like they are going around a tight radius curve. > > >
