I don't have this speed matching problem either.  My railroad is all (well
almost) steam so each locomotive needs its own engineer (loco driver).  The
railcars I like didn't have MU connections either, so no need there for any
speed matching.

"DCC" Dave Heine
Easton, PA


    
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
shabbona_rr
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: Speed Matching, etc.

I'm glad I don't have all these problems!

"S"tring boB ____________________________________________________


--- In [email protected], "Edward Loizeaux" <Loizeaux@...> 
> 
> An easier way is by using JMRI/Decoder Pro and let your PC/laptop do 
> the diddling.  It is somewhat automatic after you set the slow point 
> and the fast point and choose a speed curve.  The computer does all 
> the hard work of matching one loco to another.  Many experienced 
> speed-matching folks report speed matching of four locos in about an 
> hour.  That would cover an A-B-B-A, at least.  Of course, these 
> results are AFTER the learning curve is behind them and it just 
> becomes a procedure to be followed without too much experimentation.
> 


--- In [email protected], "Edward Loizeaux" <Loizeaux@...> wrote:
>
> > > However my understanding is Lionel has altered the gearing on the 
> > > second
> run U33's and now they won't play nice with the first run.  Thanks 
> Lionel - you just killed any repurchase from my POV.
> 
>  
> 
> Poor Lionel.  The first run was too fast and so S scale guys complained.
> Lionel reduced the top speed and the S scale guys are again complaining.
> They want it to go faster now.  Poor Lionel, what can they ever do right?
> 
>  
> 
> > > Boy, it seems we come up with more reasons for Lionel to abandon 
> > > the
> scale market than to continue...
> 
>  
> 
> Human nature is strange, to say the least.  But the stated problem has 
> an easy solution.  No need to complain about anything.
> 
>  
> 
> >> I can only assume any changes MTH makes to the former SHS drive
> mechanisms will be greeted with the same enthusiasm.
> 
> >> Rich G(ajnak)
> 
>  
> 
> I cannot wait to hear the complaints when the MTH catalog comes out.  
> A field day for the pouters.  Maybe I will go on vacation for a couple 
> of weeks.  Get away from it all.
> 
>  
> 
> >> What does concern me is whether different locomotives will MU or 
> >> double
> head.
> 
>  
> 
> Speed matching is a proven concept with Tsunami and other modern 
> NMRA/DCC decoders.  I am not sure why there is concern.  Many HO guys 
> here in the San Francisco area do speed matching at numerous op 
> sessions and club runs on a regular basis without difficulty.
> 
>  
> 
> >> I have a first run U33c, now with the pilots fixed to the frame, 
> >> scale
> wheels, Kadee couplers (actually I think they are Walthers) and a 
> Tsunami decoder. It's a bit faster than I would have preferred
> 
>  
> 
> Excessive speed can easily be reduced by setting a CV for maximum speed.
> Easy to do.  No need to live with something considered to be too fast.  
> 
>  
> 
> >> Now I know some of my DCC friends are already thinking all you have 
> >> to do
> is diddle endlessly with speed tables and CV's to get it right. Been 
> there, done that.
> 
>  
> 
> Diddling with speed tables and CV's is one way to get there.  No doubt 
> that it is the hard way to reach the goal.
> 
>  
> 
> An easier way is by using JMRI/Decoder Pro and let your PC/laptop do 
> the diddling.  It is somewhat automatic after you set the slow point 
> and the fast point and choose a speed curve.  The computer does all 
> the hard work of matching one loco to another.  Many experienced 
> speed-matching folks report speed matching of four locos in about an 
> hour.  That would cover an A-B-B-A, at least.  Of course, these 
> results are AFTER the learning curve is behind them and it just 
> becomes a procedure to be followed without too much experimentation.
> 
>  
> 
> Another approach, discovered by John Gibson, is to use some new 
> whiz-bang software product which does it all automatically.  A loop of 
> track is set up with sensors at multiple points along the way.  The 
> "master" loco is run around at various speed steps and the 
> time/speed/location data is collected and stored.  Then the "slave" 
> loco is run around the same loop of track and the computer matches it 
> to the "master" just run earlier.  Apparently it works well and is 
> almost totally automatic in operation.  No more diddling with CVs at 
> all.  Of course, you need a loop of track, a computer, numerous 
> sensors, software and a learning curve to master.  But then it becomes 
> a slam dunk.  Or so it is reported.  John Gibson has the details for those
interested.
> 
>  
> 
> >> It works in some cases where the differences aren't great in the 
> >> first
> place but it is not a cure-all. There is only so much you can do when 
> designs and gear rations vary too much.
> 
>  
> 
> Just about every HO guy in Santa Clara County would disagree with that 
> conclusion.  Speed matching is done all the time in HO with different 
> brands of locos, different motors, different gear ratios and so forth.  
> It works when done properly.  In the case of Lionel's U33, the gear 
> ratios between the first and second production runs were changed from 
> 12:1 to 15:1 which is about a 25% reduction in top speed.  With the 
> same motor and drive train, this is not a huge difference and can easily
be handled with speed matching.
> If MUing two U33 locos makes my heart beat faster, I would certainly 
> not let a bit of speed matching stand between me and that joy.  This 
> is really not a problem with a Tsunami in the loco.
> 
>  
> 
> The ultimate test for speed matching is to run both DCC 
> decoder-equipped locos forward at medium speed with medium momentum.  Hit
the reverse button.
> Both locos should slowly decrease speed, stop, reverse, slowly start 
> up and reach medium speed going backwards - all the while traveling at 
> about the same speed as each other.  This is done routinely by several 
> folks around here and they do not consider it unusual at all.
> 
>  
> 
> Trying to educate, not criticize.  Hope this is taken in the spirit 
> intended.
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers..Ed Loizeaux
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links







------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to