I have to agree with Brooks. After years of writing for magazines on various 
subjects, I find myself wanting to spend more and more time on the layout. I 
haven't written anything of note for about two years, now, and while the desire 
is there, I feel a lot of the things I do are probably dated and of little 
interest to contemporary modelers. Thus I focus my efforts on what I have 
always dreamed of, a secondary light density Class I main line.

More later, the dog is about to get my breakfast!

boB Nicholson  _______________________________________________________

--- In [email protected], "bcgsteam" <bcgsteam@...> wrote:
>
> Roger,
> Interestingly, a discussion of writing articles and publishing photos of our 
> layouts came up last night at an operating session on an N scale layout.  
> There were N scalers, HO guys, and one S guy (me!) involved.  What was clear 
> is that an individual modeler has to have an interest in that aspect of the 
> hobby, not just a layout that would be "magazine worthy".  In our operating 
> group there are probably 6 layouts that could easily be featured one of the 
> mainstream magazines but the modelers have other priorities.  One fellow 
> there last night who has a fantastic HO layout said he would rather work on 
> the next layout project than dedicate the time to take photographs and write 
> a piece.  And that's just fine.  Ours is a wonderfully diverse hobby and it's 
> simply a matter of what's of interest.  I suspect that the reason more S 
> modelers that have models and layouts that could be published don't do so is 
> simply that they have other priorities.  Those of us who do enjoy preparing 
> articles are a small percentage of all S gaugers, but probably no smaller a 
> percentage than in any other scale.  But that relatively small number results 
> in a small number of S layouts appearing in the magazines.  I would restate 
> what I have before, however.  It is not that difficult to prepare photos and 
> text for publication.  I use a camera that costs about $400 and two very old 
> photo floods that new probably cost less than $50.  There isn't anything that 
> mysterious about requirements for publication of photos other than that they 
> are well lit and well focused...the same thing you want in a family snapshot. 
>  That don't have to be contest winners to be appropriate.  JPEG format, the 
> format that comes directly out of the camera, is acceptable and even 
> inexpensive cameras these days have more than enough resolution and their 
> autofocus features work fine, especially in the larger scales like ours.  The 
> text can be submitted as a Word document, the format most everyone uses for 
> reports, etc.  For those interested, photography and writing articles for 
> magazines becomes another challenging and creative aspect of our hobby.  As 
> I've said before, I'd be glad to chat off line with any one who would like 
> some encouragement or support.  Brooks
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Make that 198!  It would be great if your neighbors could share some pics 
> > of their layout with at least the S community.
> > 
> > Thanks,  Roger
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to