Rui, > and byte-length map should be added to support multibyte encoding. Do you mean that in order for expat to recognize an encoding of an input document, one has to supply the table that tells expat the length of the multibyte code for each leading byte in this encoding? Thinking of this, it should not be too hard to write a small program to generate such a table for any given Unicode definition file of an encoding, as at http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ Still, it's bad that an encoding can't be supported (on input) using iconv alone... but this looks like a reasonable way of obtaining the extra data file necessary. Tom
- [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Kestutis Kupciunas
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Sander van Zoest
- Re[2]: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Pavel Storek
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Petr Cimprich
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Rui Hirokawa
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinion... Rui Hirokawa
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Mark Bartel
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Steve Tinney
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Petr Cimprich
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Steve Tinney
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Peter Flynn
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Peter Flynn
