Peter, you got me wrong, that was a list of encodings that *would* be included! Tom Peter Flynn wrote: > 8859-2 is pretty essential as it covers rather a lot of characters > needed for > European language support which are not in 8859-1.
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Rui Hirokawa
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Rui Hirokawa
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Mark Bartel
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Steve Tinney
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Petr Cimprich
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Steve Tinney
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Peter Flynn
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Peter Flynn
- [Sab] xsl:number �rvar K�rason
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Petr Cimprich
- RE: RE: [Sab] xsl:number �rvar K�rason
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Petr Cimprich
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Pavel Hlavnicka
