Mark Bartel wrote:
> I second this sentiment, that going away from iconv would seem a very large
> step back, and I'd also like to know more about the problems of which you
> speak.

I don't follow fully whether the proposed change will compromise
Sablotron's effectiveness as a standalone processor; i.e., will it make
Sab too tightly wedded to Perl?

If so, that would be a bad thing, I think.  Sablotron is slick enough to
use in a pipeline as just one more processing phase, and it should keep
all the standalone functionality it can.
 
 Steve

Reply via email to