At Wednesday, 31 January 2001, you wrote: >On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:54:39PM +0100, Tom Kaiser wrote: >[snip] >> Would anyone greatly miss any encoding which does NOT appear in the list >> below? (This is the list of encodings covered by XML::Encoding). >> Big 5, ISO-8859-2 to ISO-8859-9, x-euc-jp, x-euc-kr, x-sjis >> (Shift_JIS), windows-1250 >> (plus the built-in ISO-8859-1, US_ASCII, UTF-8 and UTF-16) >> >Don't take me wrong, but that would be a large step back for sablotron. >Limiting to such a small subset of encodings, knowing possibilities of iconv >would make some sablotron users cry. 8859-2 is pretty essential as it covers rather a lot of characters needed for European language support which are not in 8859-1. ///Peter
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Petr Cimprich
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Rui Hirokawa
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Rui Hirokawa
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Mark Bartel
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Steve Tinney
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Petr Cimprich
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Steve Tinney
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Peter Flynn
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] encodings - opinions? Peter Flynn
- [Sab] xsl:number �rvar K�rason
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Petr Cimprich
- RE: RE: [Sab] xsl:number �rvar K�rason
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Petr Cimprich
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Tom Kaiser
- Re: [Sab] xsl:number Pavel Hlavnicka
