William Stein wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd also like to post it somewhere so that people with much more
>> experience than I can comment and/or implement whatever they want.
>> Where is the most appropriate place to put it?  The wiki?  If the wiki
>> or the trac is the right place, can I have an account on it?
> 
> The trac server is the best place.  Please send me an offlist
> email with your requested login name and silly password (just
> to avoid spam).

Done.


> 
>> Right now, the list of equivalent functions is an OpenOffice
>> spreadsheet.  I've listed every SAGE graph function I could find with
>> the corresponding Combinatorica function (if one exists) and made some
>> notes of different implementation choices.
> 
> It would be wonderful to have this converted into latex so it can
> be added to the graph theory chapter of the reference manual.

Would you like to have comparisons like this added to the manual?  I
thought we had a wiki page devoted to comparisons, but the manual was
restricted to what was actually implemented in SAGE.  But tell me what
you think is best and I can work towards that.  Another thing to do is
to just put in the documentation of each function what the equivalent
Mathematica function is.


>>
>> Overall, I was very impressed with how much functionality is in SAGE,
>> but not in Mathematica.  Of course, there is still quite a bit of work
>> implementing the rest of the Combinatorica functions in SAGE.
> 
> Could you post a link to the spreadsheet so we can see what is left
> to do?

Yes.  Is there some way to post this on the sage server?  If not, I'll
post it on my web page and publish a link.

-Jason


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to