> Overall, I was very impressed with how much functionality is in SAGE, > but not in Mathematica. Of course, there is still quite a bit of work > implementing the rest of the Combinatorica functions in SAGE.
Briefly looking through the Combinatorica documentation, I think I have everything (and more!) that they have implemented in the combinatorics stuff I've been working on. It should be in SAGE 2.9. --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
