Mike Hansen wrote: >> Overall, I was very impressed with how much functionality is in SAGE, >> but not in Mathematica. Of course, there is still quite a bit of work >> implementing the rest of the Combinatorica functions in SAGE. > > Briefly looking through the Combinatorica documentation, I think I > have everything (and more!) that they have implemented in the > combinatorics stuff I've been working on. It should be in SAGE 2.9.
Do you mean just the combinatorics stuff (partitions, counting stuff, etc.), or are you also talking about some of the graph functions? Either way, that is very cool! As I went through the entire function list, I deleted all the combinatorics functions. As I did that, though, I kept thinking that sometime I'd have to go back through and list those and in a similar "todo" list. I'm excited to see SAGE 2.9! -Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
