I'm not sure whether it would be better (for me) to work on the openmath-stuff David proposed or whether I should engage with combinatorics (Mike Hansen). I must say that I'm definitely interested in the combinatorics implementation; I'm not at all familiar with tcl/tk. Of course, I could always do some documenting work. And I'm also not sure about the substitution of subexpressions concerning SymPy, I would need some information on that. Still, combinatorics sounds very good. So... What do you propose?
Best wishes, Fabio On 10/6/07, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/5/07, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greetings to everyone, > > > > I'm new to the mailing list and so I'm actually just forwarding what > I've > > already sent to Prof. Stein. > > If anyone has the time to do so, please read my original message and > answer > > with regard to it > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Fabio Tonti > > > I have a number of combinatorics projects that would be relatively > good projects to start off with as well. For example, porting some > code over from MuPAD-Combinat for the enumeration and generation of > all matrices with fixed row and column sums. Let me know if things of > that nature interest you. > > --Mike > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
