On 10/6/07, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure whether it would be better (for me) to work on the > openmath-stuff David proposed or whether I should engage with combinatorics > (Mike Hansen). I must say that I'm definitely interested in the > combinatorics implementation; I'm not at all familiar with tcl/tk. Of > course, I could always do some documenting work. And I'm also not sure about > the substitution of subexpressions concerning SymPy, I would need some > information on that. Still, combinatorics sounds very good. So... What do > you propose? >
I think combinatorics would be best for you, since it will involve the most interesting mathematics, and you're already interested in it, and there's a lot of momentum there right now with what Mike is doing. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
