Well, that seems very sound. I'm very happy that there is something to do. In other words: I'm in (if I'm allowed to say this ;) ).
Of course, I need more information about it. So please mail me everything I need to know. Just one more question: is there a time limit for such projects? (I'll try to work as fast as I can, but I don't know how it compares to other developers since it's the first project I'm directly involved with) I hope this question won't make a bad impression. Thanks again. Best wishes, Fabio On 10/6/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/6/07, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure whether it would be better (for me) to work on the > > openmath-stuff David proposed or whether I should engage with > combinatorics > > (Mike Hansen). I must say that I'm definitely interested in the > > combinatorics implementation; I'm not at all familiar with tcl/tk. Of > > course, I could always do some documenting work. And I'm also not sure > about > > the substitution of subexpressions concerning SymPy, I would need some > > information on that. Still, combinatorics sounds very good. So... What > do > > you propose? > > > > I think combinatorics would be best for you, since it will involve > the most interesting mathematics, and you're already interested > in it, and there's a lot of momentum there right now with what > Mike is doing. > > William > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
